Abstract

Abstract. The indirect effect of atmospheric aerosol particles on the Earth's radiation balance remains one of the most uncertain components affecting climate change throughout the industrial period. The large uncertainty is partly due to the incomplete understanding of aerosol–cloud interactions. One objective of the GoAmazon2014/5 and the ACRIDICON (Aerosol, Cloud, Precipitation, and Radiation Interactions and Dynamics of Convective Cloud Systems)-CHUVA (Cloud Processes of the Main Precipitation Systems in Brazil) projects was to understand the influence of emissions from the tropical megacity of Manaus (Brazil) on the surrounding atmospheric environment of the rainforest and to investigate its role in the life cycle of convective clouds. During one of the intensive observation periods (IOPs) in the dry season from 1 September to 10 October 2014, comprehensive measurements of trace gases and aerosol properties were carried out at several ground sites. In a coordinated way, the advanced suites of sophisticated in situ instruments were deployed aboard both the US Department of Energy Gulfstream-1 (G1) aircraft and the German High Altitude and Long-Range Research Aircraft (HALO) during three coordinated flights on 9 and 21 September and 1 October. Here, we report on the comparison of measurements collected by the two aircraft during these three flights. Such comparisons are challenging but essential for assessing the data quality from the individual platforms and quantifying their uncertainty sources. Similar instruments mounted on the G1 and HALO collected vertical profile measurements of aerosol particle number concentrations and size distribution, cloud condensation nuclei concentrations, ozone and carbon monoxide mixing ratios, cloud droplet size distributions, and downward solar irradiance. We find that the above measurements from the two aircraft agreed within the measurement uncertainties. The relative fraction of the aerosol chemical composition measured by instruments on HALO agreed with the corresponding G1 data, although the total mass loadings only have a good agreement at high altitudes. Furthermore, possible causes of the discrepancies between measurements on the G1 and HALO are examined in this paper. Based on these results, criteria for meaningful aircraft measurement comparisons are discussed.

Highlights

  • Dominated by biogenic sources, the Amazon basin is one of the few remaining continental regions where atmospheric conditions realistically represent those of the pristine or preindustrial era (Andreae et al, 2015)

  • As a natural climatic “chamber”, the area around the urban region of Manaus in central Amazonia is an ideal location for studying the atmosphere under natural conditions as well as under conditions influenced by human activities and biomass burning events (Andreae et al, 2015; Artaxo et al, 2013; Davidson et al, 2012; Keller et al, 2009; Kuhn et al, 2010; Martin et al, 2016b; Pöhlker et al, 2018; Poschl et al, 2010; Salati and Vose, 1984)

  • The ground sites were overflown with the low-altitude US Department of Energy (DOE) Gulfstream-1 (G1) aircraft and the German High Altitude and Long Range Research Aircraft (HALO)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The Amazon basin is one of the few remaining continental regions where atmospheric conditions realistically represent those of the pristine or preindustrial era (Andreae et al, 2015). As more and more data sets are merged to link the groundbased measurements with aircraft observations, and as more studies focus on the spatial variation and temporal evolution of the atmospheric properties, it is critical to quantify the uncertainty ranges when combining the data collected from the different platforms. Tween the measurements aboard the two aircraft for a nearly full set of gas, aerosol particle, and cloud variables Results from this comparison study provide the foundation for assessing and interpreting the observations from multiple platforms (from the ground to low altitude and to high altitude) and for providing high-quality data to improve the understanding of the accuracy of the measurements related to the effects of human activities in Manaus on local air quality, terrestrial ecosystems in the rainforest, and tropical weather

Instruments
Atmospheric parameters
Gas phase
Aerosol
Clouds
Solar radiation
Flight patterns
Comparison of the G1 and HALO measurements of atmospheric state parameters
September 2014
Comparison of trace gas measurements
Comparison of aerosol measurements
Aerosol particle number concentration
Aerosol particle size distribution
Aerosol particle chemical composition
CCN number concentration
Comparison of cloud measurements
Comparison of radiation measurements
Uncertainty assessment
Summary
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call