Comparison of aggressive versus standard intravenous hydration for clinical improvement among patients with mild acute pancreatitis: A randomized controlled trial

Abstract

BackgroundControversy remains regarding fluid management strategy, optimal volume and rate of intravenous fluid in mild acute pancreatitis. We performed a randomized controlled trial to compare clinical improvement and inflammatory markers between aggressive and standard fluid management. MethodsA single center prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted in a tertiary care hospital. We randomized patients with a diagnosis of mild acute pancreatitis using revised Atlanta classification in two groups, the aggressive (20 ml/kg bolus followed by 3 ml/kg/hr) and standard (10 ml/kg bolus followed by 1.5 ml/kg/hr) intravenous hydration with Lactated Ringer's solution. Primary outcome was clinical improvement at 24 and 36 hours. ResultsThe mean age of patients was 46 years and 34 patients (77%) were male. The average volumes of fluid during the first 24 hours in aggressive and standard groups was 4886 ml (71 ml/kg) and 3985 ml (53 ml/kg), respectively; p-value 0.002. Aggressive intravenous hydration did not significantly improve clinical outcome compared with standard intravenous hydration (45.45% vs. 31.82%, respectively; p-value 0.353). However, subgroup analysis between patients with obese and non-obese status, revealed aggressive intravenous hydration significantly improved clinical outcome within the first 24 hours in obese group. ConclusionAggressive intravenous hydration with Lactated Ringer's solution did not improve clinical outcome in mild acute pancreatitis but showed statistically significant improvement only in patients with obese status. Future studies should include a larger sample size to confirm these findings.