Abstract

Reference intervals for basic liver laboratory diagnostic rely on manufacturers' information, remaining unchanged for more than 20 years. This ignores known age and sex dependencies. We performed a retrospective cross-sectional study to compare the age-dependent distribution of flagged and non-flagged laboratory findings between reference limits from 3 distinct sources: manufacturer, published reference study, and the truncated maximum likelihood method applied on a cohort of inpatients aged 18-100 years. Discordance rates adjusted for the permissible analytical uncertainty are reported for serum levels of albumin (n= 150,550), alkaline phosphatase (n= 433,721), gamma-GT (n=580,012), AST (n= 510,620), and ALT (n= 704,546). The number of flagged findings differed notably between reference intervals compared, except for alkaline phosphatase. AST and alkaline phosphatase increased with age in women. Overall discordance for AP, AST, and ALT remained below 10%, respectively, in both sexes. Albumin decreased with age which led to discordant flags in up to 22% in patients ≥70 years. GGT and ALT peaked in 50-59-year-old men with up to 23.5% and 22.8% discordant flags, respectively. We assessed the impact of different reference limits on liver related laboratory results and found up to 25 % discordant flags. We suggest to further analyse the diagnostic and economic effects of reference limits adapted to the population of interest even for well-established basic liver diagnostics.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.