Abstract

Comparing results of different genetic diversity estimation methods may be indicative of their utility as parental selection tools for plant breeders. Forty‐three spring and winter wheat lines (Tritlcum aestivum L.) from the Pacific Northwest (PNW) were used to compare pedigree and amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP)‐based genetic diversity estimates (GDEPED and GDEAFLP, respectively). The mean of the 903 GDEPED pairwise comparisons was 0.96, and 89% of the values were >0.90. In contrast, GDEAFLP values were normally distributed (mean = 0.54), suggesting that this diversity measure was better able to identify pairs of genotypes representing the entire range of possible GDEs. Thus, GDEAFLP may have more utility than GDEPED for identifying parental combinations with maximum allelic variation. Despite the substantially different means and distributions of the two diversity measures, a moderate rank correlation (rs = 0.42, P < 0.001) was detected between the two GDE matrices. AFLP fragments from hypomethylated portions of the genome (generated with Pst I:Mse I) were more highly associated with GDEPED than were fragments generated with the methylation insensitive combination Eco RI:Mse I (rs = 0.44 and 0.28, respectively). Pedigree and AFLP‐based GDEs detected a similar hierarchical pattern of genetic diversity among the 43 cultivars evaluated. Although GDEPED was not well suited for identifying degree of relatedness among individuals, it may be adequate for assessing overall patterns of genetic variation among regionally adapted germplasm. It remains to be determined which method, if either, provides predictive estimates of heterosis or genetic variance among progeny from specific parental combinations.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.