Abstract
Boost converter (BC) accompanied with non-minimum phase behaviour for right-half plane (RHP) zero availability. This incident put a cap on the control loop attainable bandwidth of the converter-controller system. Absence of modelled dynamics and disturbances in different formats (external/internal) make this objective quite challenging in practical scenario. In this work, three advanced analog control archetypes [PWM based Sliding Mode Controller (SMC), Type III and best possible 2&3-DOF Internal Model Controller (IMC)] have been discussed & implemented for boost converter. Converter’s responses with these control structures have been compared under conditions like supply voltage variations, reference tracking and parametric imbalance. SMC is faster than IMC, Type III based output but with a steady-state error. Both IMCs (2&3-DOF) have better perturbation rejection capability than Type III controller.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
