Comparison of adjustable and nonadjustable single-incision mini-slings in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: An initial experience with 30 cases

Abstract

ObjectiveSeveral single-incision mini-slings (SIMSs) have been developed to minimize the potential complications associated with retropubic or transobturator mid-urethral slings. However, few studies compared the efficacy of different types of SIMS. This study compared the outcomes of an adjustable SIMS (Ajust) with a nonadjustable SIMS (Solyx) in the treatment of urodynamic stress incontinence (USI) over postoperative follow-up of 12 months. Materials and methodsIn this study, the surgical outcomes of the first 30 patients receiving Ajust and the first 30 patients undergoing Solyx at a university hospital were reviewed retrospectively, all of whom were diagnosed with USI without coexistent pelvic organ prolapse. Preoperative and postoperative examinations included structured urogynecological questionnaires, 1-hour pad tests, and complete urodynamic testing. Patient demographics, urodynamic parameters, and 12-months surgical outcomes were compared between the Ajust and Solyx groups. ResultsThere were no significant differences between the Ajust and Solyx groups in terms of subjective cure rate (93.3% vs 90.0%), objective cure rate (89.3% vs 89.3%), and de novo urgency or urge urinary incontinence (13.3% vs 16.7%) 12 months after surgery. Postoperatively, both Urogenital Distress Inventory-6 and Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-7 scores were significantly improved in the Ajust and Solyx groups. In comparison with preoperative data, postoperative urodynamic results revealed a significant decrease in maximal urethral closure pressure in the Ajust group (n = 28) and a significant increase in residual urine in the Solyx group (n = 28). However, significant differences were not observed in the postoperative pad test and urodynamic data between the Ajust and Solyx groups, and no major complications occurred in either group. ConclusionsIn this paper describing the preliminary experience of 30 patients, both adjustable and nonadjustable SIMS performed by an experienced surgeon were safe and effective in correcting USI at 12-month postoperative follow-up.