Abstract
Aim: Comparison of accuracy rate in prediction of cardiovascular disease using Novel Random Forest with Logistic Regression. Materials and Methods: The Novel Random forest (N=20) and Novel Logistic Regression Algorithm (N=20) these two algorithms are calculated by using 2 Groups and taken 20 samples for both algorithm and accuracy in this work.The sample size is determined using the G power Calculator and it’s found to be 10. Results: The Random Forest exhibited 89.06% accuracy whilst a Logistic Regression has shown 92.18%. accuracy. Statistical significance difference between Random forest algorithm and Novel Logistic Regression Algorithm was found to be p=0.001 (2 tailed) (p<0.5). Conclusion: Prediction of cardiovascular disease using Logistic Regression is significantly better than the Random Forest.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
