Abstract

AbstractAimThe aim was to compare the use of a piezoelectric handpiece versus a standard surgical handpiece in removal of impacted third molars under general anaesthesia.Materials and methodsThirty patients undergoing routine third molar removal were included in the study. Panoramic radiographs were used to assess the positioning of the impacted third molars. The patients were randomly subdivided and the split mouth technique was used in which each side (left or right) of the mouth was randomly assigned to two treatment groups. Hence each patient served as their own control. In one group, a piezoelectric handpiece was used, while a conventional handpiece was used for the second group.All aspects of preoperative care, general anaesthesia, surgery and post‐operative care were standardised for the two groups. The following parameters were recorded; time of surgery, bleeding during surgery, post‐operative swelling, post‐operative pain, associated complications and post‐operative nerve injury.ResultsNo statistically significant difference was found between the groups in terms of pain and swelling. There was less bleeding with the use of the piezoelectric device as compared with the standard surgical handpiece; however, the surgical time was longer. There were no reports of trauma to the lips or intra‐oral soft tissue. There were two incidences (6.7%) of post‐operative paraesthesia in the standard surgical handpiece group.ConclusionsThe use of a piezoelectric device is an acceptable alternative to the standard surgical handpiece in third molar surgery. Its use is advocated in difficult cases especially where there is inferior alveolar nerve approximation.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.