Comparison of a local injection of hyperosmolar glucose solution with salpingostomy for the conservative treatment of tubal pregnancy

Abstract

To compare a local injection of hyperosmolar glucose and salpingostomy for the laparoscopic treatment of tubal pregnancy in terms of immediate success and postoperative tubal patency. Prospective. PATIENTS, SETTING: Forty women with an unruptured tubal pregnancy were enrolled from among 117 women with ectopic pregnancies (EPs) admitted consecutively to the university clinic. The inclusion criteria were as follows: [1] concentration of beta-hCG in the serum < or = 5,000 IU/L; [2] no living fetus in the EP; and [3] unruptured tubal pregnancy at laparoscopy. After randomization, 20 of these patients were treated with a local injection of hyperosmolar (50%) glucose solution and 20 women by salpingostomy. Tubal patency was evaluated at relaparoscopy or by hysterosalpingography 6 to 13 months after the primary treatment. The mean decrease in beta-hCG concentration from the preoperative value to the first postoperative day was 37% and 52% in the glucose and salpingostomy groups, respectively, and the mean resolution time was 13 and 12 days, respectively. Human chorionic gonadotropin showed a persistent EP in 4 women (20%) in the glucose group and 2 (10%) in the salpingostomy group. A patent treated tube was found in 9 of 13 women in the glucose group and 9 of 10 in the salpingostomy group at re-examination. During a follow-up of 6 to 20 months 4 women in the glucose group and 4 women in the salpingostomy group had an intrauterine pregnancy. A local injection of hyperosmolar glucose is a reasonable method treating tubal pregnancy in selected cases but does not seem to offer any advantage over salpingostomy concerning persistent trophoblastic disease rate.