Abstract

Objective To compare the positional and volumetric differences of internal gross target volumes (IGTVs) delineation based on four-dimensional CT (4D-CT) images and different standardized uptake values of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography CT (PET-CT) for the primary non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Methods Ten NSCLC patients underwent enhanced three-dimensional CT scan followed by enhanced 4D-CT scan of the thorax under normal free breathing and then 18F-FDG PET-CT scan was performed based on the same position and positioning parameters.The gross target volumes (GTVs) of 10 phases of 4D-CT were contoured and IGTV10 was obtained by fusion of the 10 GTVs.IGTVPET were determined with nine different threshold methods using the auto-contouring function and manual contouring.The differences of position,volume,degree of inclusion (DI) and conformity index (CI) between IGTVPET and IGTV10 were compared.Results For superior-inferior (SI) directions,there were statistically significant differences between the centric coordinate parameters of IGTVPET(excluding IGTVPET1.5) and IGTV10 (Z =-2.703--2.293,P < 0.05).In volume terms,IGTVPET2.0 was approximated close to IGTV10 with median volume ratios of 0.90,followed by IGTVPET20% to IGTV10 with median volume ratios of 0.84,but there was no significant difference between them.The DI of IGTVPET1.5 in IGTV10 was higher than the DIs of other IGTVPET in IGTV10 (Z =-2.803--2.429,P < 0.05).The CI of IGTVPE2.0 and IGTV10 was superior than the CIs of IGTVPET35% and IGTV10,IGTVPET40% and IGTV10,IGTVPET2.5 and IGTV10,IGTVPET3.0 and IGTV10 (Z =-2.803--2.191,P < 0.05).Conclusions The IGTVPET contoured by SUV≥2.0 or 20% of the maximal SUV are approximate close to IGTV10 in target size,but the extent of spatial mismatch is relatively obvious between them.So neither IGTVPET20% nor IGTVPET2.0 could replace IGTV10. Key words: Non-small cell lung cancer; Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography computed tomography; Four-dimensional computed tomography; Internal gross target volume; Standardized uptake value

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call