Abstract

Abstract 1797Poster Board I-823 IntroductionComorbidities affect daily function, treatment tolerance and mortality of pts. Therefore their analysis and impact as prognostic factors on treatment outcome seems relevant, especially in times of different treatment modalities. Aim of our analysis was the development of a specific comorbidity index (CI) to predict the influence on progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in MM pts. MethodsIn this retrospective analysis between 1997 and 2003, we determined the comorbidity factors age, Karnofsky Index (KI), hypertension, diabetes, secondary malignancies, pain, liver-, heart-, lung-diseases and renal impairment (RI, estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] by MDRD) in 127 MM pts, receiving standard (n=65) or high-dose chemotherapy (n=62). We ascertained the prognostic value of single risk factors, compared previously established CIs (Kaplan Feinstein [KF]; Charlson-Comorbidity [CCI]; Satariano [SI]; Hematopoietic cell transplantation-specific comorbidity index [HCT-CI]), and via univariate and multivariate analyses determined a MM-specific risk (KLeber) score. ResultsThe pt characteristics revealed a median age of 60 years (range 27-83), males and females were 70 vs. 57, the median KI 90%, and stage II/III disease by Salmon&Durie and ISS present in 91% and 41%, respectively. The median PFS and OS for all pts were 69 and 35 months (ms), respectively. Univariate analysis determined moderate or severe pulmonary disease (p< 0.0001, hazard ratio [HR]: 3.5), RI (p= 0.0018, HR: 3.4), decreased KI (p= 0.0004, HR: 2.7) and age > 59 years (y) (p= 0.0114, HR: 2) as most important variables for diminished OS, whereas pain (p= 0.2105), liver- (p= 0.6328) and heart-disease (p= 0.9970), hypertension (p=0.5949), diabetes (p=0.9782) and second malignancy (p=0.9605) proved of lesser or no significance. Via multivariate analysis, eGFR '30ml/min/1.73m2, moderate or severe lung disease and KI '70% were key factors for decreased OS, with HRs of 2.9, 2.8 and 2.2, respectively. Comparison of prior CIs, namely KF, CCI, SI and HCT-CI showed that the KF and HCT-CI were more critical for MM pts than SI and CCI, with both former scores revealing strikingly different OS rates for ‘low-' vs. ‘high-scoring-pts' of 98 vs. 44ms (p=0.007) and 81 vs. 41ms (p=0.002), respectively (low-risk being defined as pts scoring 'median CI points, high-risk with >median CI points). When incorporating KI'70 (K), moderate or severe lung disease (L) and eGFR<30 (e) in a MM-specific risk (KLeber-) score, we identified significantly differing OS rates with 0,1,2 or 3 risk factors (Table 1).Table 1Risk stratification by combination of KI'70%, moderate or severe lung disease and eGFR<30 from uni-and multivariate analyses in the KLeber-risk score# of risk factorsnmedian OS (months)HR (95% CI)p-value*0741181.0 (reference)-136532.5 (1.4 - 4.5)0.00332 or 317256.5 (3.2 – 13.2)< 0.0001*Chi-SquareThe 2-group analysis of pts without (n=74) vs. those with KLeber-risk factors (n=53) showed substantial median OS differences of 117.5 vs. 40.6ms, respectively (p<0.0001), which were larger than with any other comorbidity assessment, albeit needs to be tested in a larger pt cohort to prove its validity and superiority to current scores and as a possibly better comorbidity tool for myeloma pts. ConclusionsThese findings demonstrate that comorbidities in MM pts are frequent and important prognostic determinants for diminished PFS and OS. The KF and HCT-CI proved of higher significance than SI and CCI in MM. Due to the numerous prognostic factors that these 4 comorbidity scores KF, HCT-CI, SI and CCI assess, not proving to be all of significance for MM in our analysis, more easily assessable MM-specific risk scores seem of importance. In our novel KLeber score, only 3 comorbidity factors proved essential from uni-and multivariate analyses, namely KI'70%, moderate or severe lung disease and eGFR<30, thereby allowing a powerful prediction model for 3 distinct risk groups. Our results highlight the debate on comorbidity scores and treatment decision-tools in MM which have not as yet moved into routine clinical practise, but seem very attractive and useful to implement into future analyses and clinical trials. This is to our knowledge the first MM-specific risk-score which is currently being re-evaluated in an even larger and independent from this analysis new MM data set. DisclosuresNo relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.