Abstract
This study compares the key parameters of two integrated receiver front-end architectures: low noise amplifier (LNA) with active mixer against LNA with passive mixer. The authors discuss the differences in the performance and their impact on system characteristics for radar applications. A low-IF down-conversion receiver implementation is considered. The results are compared in measurement for two 24 GHz receiver front-end chips realised in a 0.13 mum digital CMOS process. Both circuits have been characterised over automotive temperature range -40 to 125degC. The front-end with an active mixer offers lower LO power dependence and exhibits better temperature stability, whereas the front-end with a passive mixer has the advantage of better input-referred linearity and lower flicker noise.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
