Abstract

The brain is a complex system consisting of regions dedicated to different brain functions, and higher cognitive functions are realized via information flow between distant brain areas communicating with each other. As such, it is natural to shift towards brain network analysis from mapping of brain functions, for deeper understanding of the brain system. The graph theoretical network metrics measure global or local properties of network topology, but they do not provide any information about the intermediate scale of the network. Community structure analysis is a useful approach to investigate the mesoscale organization of brain network. However, the community detection schemes are yet to be established.In this paper, we propose a method to compare different community detection schemes for neuroimaging data from multiple subjects. To the best of our knowledge, our method is the first attempt to evaluate community detection from multiple-subject data without “ground truth” community and any assumptions about the original network features. To show its feasibility, three community detection algorithms and three different brain atlases were examined using resting-state fMRI functional networks. As it is crucial to find a single group-based community structure as a representative for a group of subjects to allow discussion about brain areas and connections in different conditions on common ground, a number of community detection schemes based on different approaches have been proposed. A non-parametric permutation test on similarity between group-based community structures and individual community structures was used to determine which algorithm or atlas provided the best representative structure of the group. The Normalized Mutual Information (NMI) was computed to measure the similarity between the community structures. We also discuss further issues on community detection using the proposed method.

Highlights

  • Recent development in neuroimaging devices such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and electroencephalography (EEG) enable us to record human brain activity with high temporal and spatial resolutions

  • Agreement with individual community structures To assess the three community detection techniques, using the different brain atlases for parcellation, we propose to examine the similarity between a group-based community and individual community structures with a non-parametric permutation test

  • The averaged modularity indices were higher for VTS and group analysis (GA) compared to individual structure (IS) approach while VTS and GA approaches produced the groupbased communities with almost the same modularity at every density level in all atlases

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Recent development in neuroimaging devices such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and electroencephalography (EEG) enable us to record human brain activity with high temporal and spatial resolutions. For better understanding of the relationship between brain regions and their topological roles in the brain network, network analysis has been applied to structural and functional brain networks derived from neuroimaging data to quantify the topological characteristics of the network using graph theoretical network metrics such as clustering coefficient, shortest path length, small-worldness, and node centrality (Rubinov and Sporns 2010). These metrics provide useful information regarding global and local properties of the brain network, they do not provide any information about the intermediate scale of the network. Community detection techniques have been used to investigate the mesoscale network organization (Meunier et al 2010)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call