Abstract

In 24 consecutive patients with documented ventricular tachycardia (VT) (22 patients) or fibrillation (VF) (2 patients), results of 2 programmed ventricular stimulation protocols to initiate VT/VF were prospectively studied. Seventeen patients had VT/VF after a healed myocardial infarction (MI) and 7 patients had idiopathic VT. In both protocols (designated 1 and 2), the right ventricular (RV) apex was paced at 100 beats/min, using a maximum of 2 ventricular premature complexes (VPCs) given at twice diastolic threshold. This protocol had a sensitivity of 25%. In protocol 1, the pacing site was changed to the RV outflow tract and the previous steps were repeated; in protocol 2, the pacing rate was increased to 120 and 140 beats/min at the RV apex, also using a maximum of 2 VPCs. The next step in protocol 1 consisted of increase of current strength to 20 mA and repeating previous steps at the RV apex and RV outflow tract, with a maximum of 2 VPCs; in the next step in protocol 2, three VPCs were used during sinus rhythm and pacing was performed at rates of 100, 120 and 140 beats/min. In protocol 1, therefore, only stimulation site and current strength were changed, while in protocol 2 only pacing rate and number of VPCs were modified. Protocol 1 had a sensitivity of 54% and protocol 2 a sensitivity of 83%. The sensitivity of protocol 2 was statistically higher than that of protocol 1 (p < 0.05). in the group of patients with VT after MI, the sensitivity was 66% for protocol 1 and 93% for protocol 2. Protocol 2 combined with administration of isoproterenol had a sensitivity of 95% (100% in the patients with VT after MI). These observations have important implications for the design of the most successful order of programmed ventricular stimulation in patients with documented VT/VF. If stimulation at the RV apex using a single pacing rate and 2 VPCs given at twice threshold fail to initiate VT, increase of pacing rate and, thereafter, use of 3 VPCs is a much more effective means of initiating VT than changing the stimulation site to RV outflow tract or increasing the current strength to 20 mA.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.