Abstract

ObjectivesThe study objectives were to compare short time complications, mortality, and effectiveness of primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) with optimal medical therapy in older adults with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). MethodsA prospective cohort study, which patients 60 years old and over with ACS were collecting by face to face interview and assessment of the electronic document, in two educational hospitals of Tehran medical university from May 2018 to Jan. 2019. Patients were evaluated in two groups (primary PCI and medical) in terms of complications, mortality and effectiveness, 24hours and 30 days after treatment. Initially, 312 patients were enrolled in the study that 192 were excluded for different reasons. In the final, 120 patients have met all inclusion criteria. ResultsOne hundred and twenty patients were collected with mean age 71.2±8.2 years old. In both groups every 1 point increase in Instrumental Activity Daily Living (IADL), the Major Adverse Cardiac Effect (MACE) was significantly reduced up to 88% (P=0.007). Short-term mortality was significantly higher in the optimal medical therapy group (P=0.006). In comparison complications 24hours between two groups, atrial fibrillation was significantly higher in the medical group which risk increased 11 times (OR=10.93, CI95%=1.38–87.04, P=0.02). ConclusionsNotwithstanding, primary PCI reduced poor outcomes, and improve quality of life, but a lesser option for older adult patients. Primary PCI in older adult patients could maintain independence in functional daily living that results in reduced mortality and MACE considerably.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call