Comparison between the Rotational Thromboelastometry (ROTEM) Delta device against the Cartridge-based Thromboelastography 6s and Quantra in a healthy third trimester pregnant cohort.

Abstract

Rotational Thromboelastometry (ROTEM) Delta has been described in several postpartum hemorrhage algorithms, but this device requires pipetting and careful mixing of reagents to initiate the clotting reaction. In contrast, thromboelastography (TEG 6s) and the Quantra devices operate utilizing an automated pre-mixed cartridge that only requires a blood sample to start the clot strength analysis. We compared the correlation between 3 point of care viscoelastic testing (POCVT) devices to laboratory Clauss fibrinogen and platelets, their inter-device correlation, and the total running time difference between Quantra and ROTEM. A high correlation was noted between the Clauss fibrinogen and the fibrinogen parameters from ROTEM (r = 0.76-0.84, P < 0.0001), TEG6s (r = 0.71, P < 0.0001) and Quantra (r = 0.72, P = 0.0001). A moderate correlation between laboratory platelets and the ROTEM (r = 0.54;0.45, P < 0.0001; P = 0.0013) and Quantra (r = 0.66, P = 0.0001) parameters was noted. The inter-device correlation showed to be high when comparing the fibrinogen parameters of TEG6s and Quantra to that of ROTEM (r = 0.88 and 0.74, P < 0.0001, respectively). In contrast, a moderate correlation was noted between the platelet parameters of Quantra and ROTEM (r = 0.51, p = 0.0036). The Quantra device resulted 20.9min (95% CI -0.2 to 4.7, P = 0.07) faster than the ROTEM if the warming and pipetting of reagents of the latter were considered. All the POCVT devices demonstrated a high correlation to laboratory Clauss fibrinogen, making each beneficial for the early recognition and management of hypofibrinogenemia.