Comparison between talazoparib and conventional chemotherapy in the treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer patients: A retrospective study.

Abstract

BackgroundThe benefits of talazoparib compared with conventional chemotherapy in HER2-negative advanced breast cancer (ABC) remain unclear.MethodsPatients older than 18 years, with a deleterious germline BRCA1/2 (gBRCA1/2) mutated, metastatic, or locally advanced and HER2-positive breast cancer were enrolled. Patient data including age, menostatus, tumor grade, pathologic tumor size, lymph node status, and whether they had received adjuvant radiation or chemotherapy was collected. The primary outcomes of the study were disease-free survival (DFS), which was defined as the time from randomization to death or recurrence due to any reason, and overall survival (OS), which was defined as the time from randomization to death due to any reason. P<0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.ResultsA total of 136 patients were finally enrolled in the present retrospective study, including 62 patients in the talazoparib group (group A) and 74 in the conventional chemotherapy group (group B). After a median follow-up of 70.9 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 68.3–78.5], both DFS and OS did not differ significantly between the two groups (P=0.658 and P=0.690, respectively). The exploratory subgroup analyses further validated the robustness of the primary results across the subgroups.ConclusionsTalazoparib was not better than conventional chemotherapy in terms of DFS and OS for the treatment of gBRCA1/2 mutated HER2-positive breast cancer patients.