Comparison between static modulus of elasticity, non-destructive testing moduli of elasticity and stress-wave speed in white spruce and lodgepole pine wood

Abstract

ABSTRACT Static bending tests to measure modulus of elasticity (MOEST) or wood stiffness provide an indicator of the structural performance of a finished product. These tests are however, slow and expensive. Tests to measure MOE using non-destructive testing (NDT) provide alternatives to MOEST tests; however, relationships between the different modes of measurement need to be established. Non-destructive testing MOE measured by two methods (SilviScan [MOESS] and time of flight [MOETOF]) have been compared with MOEST for lodgepole pine and white spruce. The relationships between stress wave speed (SWS) and MOEST have also been evaluated. Simple linear regressions of MOESS, MOETOF, and SWS had greater explanatory power (higher coefficients of determination (R2)) than did multiple linear regressions including growth rate or other wood fibre attributes. Simple linear regression from MOETOF and MOESS on MOEST had lower R2 for lodgepole pine than for white spruce; however, the converse was true for SWS. SWS had the highest R2 (89%) and MOESS the lowest R2 (47%) when regressed on MOEST in lodgepole pine. The results were tool and species specific, suggesting that R2 between MOEST and non-destructive testing MOE values must be validated separately for each commercial tree species and for each measurement technique.