Abstract

Currently, the greatest challenge for vine growers is to improve the yield and quality of grapes by minimizing costs and environmental impacts. This goal can be achieved through a better knowledge of vineyard spatial variability. Traditional platforms such as airborne, satellite and unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) solutions are useful investigation tools for vineyard site specific management. These remote sensing techniques are mainly exploited to get the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), which is useful for describing the morpho-vegetational characteristics of vineyards. This study was conducted in a vineyard in Tuscany (Italy) during the 2017, 2018 and 2019 seasons. Ground data were acquired to detect some agronomic variables such as yield (kg/vine), total soluble solids (TSS), and pruning weight (kg/vine). Remote sensed multispectral images acquired by UAV and Sentinel-2 (S2) satellite platform were used to assess the analysis of the vegetative variability. The UAV NDVI was extracted using both a mixed pixels approach (both vine and inter-row) and from pure canopy pixels. In addition to these UAV layers, the vine thickness was extracted. The aim of this study was to evaluate both classical Ordinary Least Square (OLS) and spatial statistical methods (Moran Index-MI and BILISA) to assess their performance in a multi-temporal comparison between satellite and ground data with UAV information. Good correlations were detected between S2 NDVI and UAV NDVI mixed pixels through both methods (R2 = 0.80 and MI = 0.75). Regarding ground data, UAV layers showed low and negative association with TSS (MI = - 0.34 was the lowest value) whereas better spatial autocorrelations with positive values were detected between UAV layers and both yield (MI ranged from 0.42 to 0.52) and pruning weight (MI ranged from 0.45 to 0.64). The spatial analysis made by MI and BILISA methodologies added more information to this study, clearly showing that both UAV and Sentinel-2 satellite allowed the vigour spatial variability within the vineyard to be detected correctly, overcoming the classical comparison methods by adding the spatial effect. MI and BILISA play a key role in identifying spatial patterns and could be successfully exploited by agricultural stakeholders.

Highlights

  • In the last years, the agriculture community has entered the world of technology, which is an increasingly indispensable resource in crop management

  • R2 ranges between the minimum value detected for Sentinel 2 (S2) Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) vs unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) NDVI filtered of 2018 - F4 dataset (R2 = 0.53), and the maximum correlation obtained for S2 NDVI vs UAV NDVI both unfiltered and filtered of the same F5 fight in the 2019 season (R2 = 0.80)

  • One of the focal points for vine growers is the need for specific agronomic management according to a proper knowledge of spatial variability and thereby reducing costs and environmental impact

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The agriculture community has entered the world of technology, which is an increasingly indispensable resource in crop management. The most common remote sensing platforms used in viticulture are Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV), airborne sensors and satellites, which can be equipped with different types of optical sensors to analyse plant response in a wide spectral range, such as RGB, multiand hyper-spectral, thermal infrared and LiDAR (Hall et al, 2002; Mathews and Jensen, 2012; Matese and Di Gennaro, 2015; Pádua et al, 2019; Sozzi et al, 2020) Among these remote sensing platforms, airborne, but above all UAV, are characterized by low operational costs, excellently timed and flexible surveys and high ground spatial resolution (even a few centimetres) providing detailed information of vine features within the field (Matese et al, 2015; Jay et al, 2019; Pichon et al, 2019; Sozzi et al, 2020). A large range of satellite sensors regularly provide free datasets, promoting satellite technology for many agricultural applications (Atzberger, 2013; Yang et al, 2017; He et al, 2018; Khaliq et al, 2019)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call