Comparison between placenta accreta scoring system, ultrasound staging, and clinical classification.

Abstract

Placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) is a series of disorders, which means that the placental trophoblast invades into the myometrium of the uterine wall. It is a serious obstetric complication which could be detected by ultrasound prenatally. In order to compare our placenta accreta scoring system with prenatal ultrasound staging system and International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) clinical classification, we did a retrospective study including 105 patients diagnosed with PAS disorders by operation or pathology at Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China, between January, 2019 and December, 2020. Placenta accreta scoring system, prenatal ultrasound staging system and FIGO clinical classification were used on each patient. Basic information and clinical outcomes including gestational weeks, intraoperative hemorrhage, hysterectomy rate and blood transfusion were also counted. Both of placenta accreta scoring system, prenatal ultrasound staging system can give a rather clear prediction of placenta percreta, with their area under curve were 0.872 (95% confidential interval [CI]: 0.793-0.951) and 0.864 (95%CI: 0.779-0.949), P value were .000 compared with clinical classification. Beside for ultrasound staging system was designed for placenta previa patients, all those 3 criteria showed their relationships with preterm birth, hysterectomy rate and intraoperative bleeding. PAS scoring system also had the ability to predict a gestational week of delivery ≤34 weeks, intraoperative massive bleeding ≥2000 mL and hysterectomy at over 12 points. Our placenta accreta scoring system had good accordance with pre-operational ultrasound staging and FIGO clinical classification, with higher universality for patients without placenta previa.