Abstract

A detailed comparison between kinetic and fluid simulations of collisionless slab ion temperature gradient driven turbulence is made. The nondissipative closure model (NCM) for linearly unstable modes, which is presented by Sugama, Watanabe, and Horton [Phys. Plasmas 8, 2617 (2001)], and the dissipative closure model by Hammett and Perkins (HP) [Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 3019 (1990)] are used in separate fluid simulations. The validity of these closure models for quantitative prediction of the turbulent thermal transport is examined by comparing nonlinear results of the fluid simulations with those of the collisionless kinetic simulation of high accuracy. Simulation results show that, in the saturated turbulent state, the turbulent thermal diffusivity χ obtained from the HP model is significantly larger than the χ given by the NCM which is closer to χ measured in the kinetic simulation. Contrary to the dissipative form of the parallel heat flux closure relation assumed in the HP model, the NCM describes well the exact kinetic simulation, in which for some unstable wave numbers k, the imaginary part of the ratio of the parallel heat flux qk to the temperature fluctuation Tk is a oscillatory function of time and sometimes takes positive values. The positive values of Im(qk/Tk), imply the negative parallel heat diffusivity, correlate with the occasional inward heat flux occurring for the wave numbers k, and reduce the total χ.

Highlights

  • Well as for any linear combination of these solutions

  • Blue horizontal lines correspond to the HP model, in which Re关 q k /(n 0 v t T k) 兴 ⫽0 and Im关 q k /(n 0 v t T k) 兴 ⫽⫺2(2/␲ ) 1/2⯝⫺1.5958

  • The NCM and the HP model are employed for linearly unstable modes

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

In the NCM, the phase of the parallel heat flux with respect to the temperature fluctuation in the unstable wave number region can take either of positive and negative signs in the turbulent states while it takes only the one-sided sign in dissipative closure models such as the HP model These different closure schemes lead to different nonlinear behaviors of the fluid variables even though they give almost the same linear results. The saturated fluctuation level, the turbulent heat diffusivity, and the ratio of the parallel heat flux to the temperature fluctuation obtained by the fluid simulations are directly compared with those in the kinetic simulation, and effects of the closure models on the resultant transport are specified. It is convenient to expand f k in terms of the Hermite poly nomials H n (x)⬅(⫺1) n e x /2d n e ⫺x /2/dx n

Tk n0 vt vt 1 qk
SIMULATION RESULTS
CONCLUSIONS
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call