Comparison between filgrastim biosimilar and filgrastim original for the management of neutropenia after salvage chemotherapy for malignant lymphoma.

Abstract

In this study, the efficacy and safety of filgrastim biosimilar (F-BS) were retrospectively compared to those of filgrastim original in the treatment of malignant lymphoma with CHASE (± R) or DeVIC(± R) in 78 patients. The median number of filgrastim doses was 11 in the F-BS group and 8 in the filgrastim group after CHASE (± R) (p = 0.8), and 10 in the F-BS group and 10 in the filgrastim group after DeVIC (± R) (p = 0.45). The median days until neutrophil recovery to ≥ 1000/μL was 10days with F-BS versus 10days with filgrastim after CHASE ± R (p = 0.59), and 9days with F-BS versus 10days with filgrastim after DeVIC ± R (p = 0.828). Febrile neutropenia (FN) was observed in 5 patients (41.7%) in the F-BS group and 9 (52.9%) in the filgrastim group after CHASE ± R therapy (p = 0.616), and in 11 patients (36.7%) in the F-BS group and 9 (47.4%) in the filgrastim group after DeVIC ± R (p = 0.462). The present results suggest that the efficacy and safety of F-BS are comparable to those of filgrastim original, with no significant differences in clinical factors. Use of F-BS also reduced medical costs per course of CHASE ± R therapy by 170.22 US dollars.