Comparison between execution and reading time of 3D ABUS versus HHUS.

Abstract

Breast density is an independent risk factor for breast cancer. Mammography is supplemented with handheld ultrasound (HHUS) to increase sensitivity. Automatic breast ultrasound (ABUS) is an alternative to HHUS. Our study wanted to assess the difference in execution and reading time between ABUS and HHUS. N = 221 women were evaluated consecutively between January 2019 and June 2019 (average age 53years; range 24-89). The execution and reading time of ABUS and HHUS was calculated with an available stopwatch. Time started for both procedures when the patient was ready on the examination table to be examined to the end of image acquisition and interpretation. No patients interrupted the exam due to pain or discomfort. N = 221 women underwent ABUS and HHUS; N = 11 patients refused to undergo both procedures due to time constraints and refused ABUS; therefore, 210 patients were enrolled with both ABUS and HHUS available. The average time to perform and read the exam was 5min for HHUS (DS ± 1.5) with a maximum time of 11min and a minimum of 2min. The average time with ABUS was 17min (DS ± 3.8, with a maximum time of 31min and a minimum time of 9min). The ABUS technique took longer to be performed in all patients, with an average difference of 11min (range 3-23min) per patient, P < 0,001. Separating ABUS execution from reading time we highlighted as ABUS execution is more time-consuming respect HHUS. In addition, we can underline that time required by radiologists is longer for ABUS even only considering the interpretation time of the exam. A significant difference was observed in the execution and reading time of the two exams, where the HHUS method was more rapid and tolerated.