Abstract
Studies comparing cosmetic outcome between conventional conservative method (CCM) and endoscope-assisted partial mastectomy (EAPM) are scarce. A total of 111 patients with stage I or II breast cancer who underwent CCM (n=51) or EAPM (n=60) were reviewed. Evaluation of cosmetic outcome consisted of a 3-level scoring method; breast retraction assessment (0-2), nipple deviation (0-2), atrophy (0-2), skin change (0-2), and scar (0-2). Total scores ≥7 were considered satisfactory. Score 2 was considered satisfactory for analysis by each scoring criterion. EAPM had a higher rate of satisfactory results compared with CCM (71.7% vs. 52.9%; P=0.042), particularly for atrophy (55.0% vs. 29.4%; P=0.007), and scar (55.0% vs. 31.4%; P=0.012) and for location B (70.0% vs. 12.5%; P=0.025). EAPM is superior to CCM for postoperative cosmetic outcome with respect to atrophy, scar, and lower tumor location.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
