Abstract

In prostate cancer external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), intra-fraction prostate drifts may compromise the treatment efficacy by underdosing the target and/or overdosing the organs at risk. In this study, a recently developed real-time adaptive planning strategy for intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for prostate cancer was evaluated in hypofractionated regimes against traditional treatment planning based on a treatment volume margin expansion. The proposed workflow makes use of a “library of plans” corresponding to possible intra-fraction prostate positions. During delivery, at each beam end, the plan prepared for the position of the prostate closest to the current one is selected and the corresponding beam delivered. This adaptive planning strategy was compared with the traditional approach on a clinical prostate cancer case where different prostate shift magnitudes were considered. Five, six and fifteen fraction hypofractionated schemes were considered for each of these scenarios. When shifts larger than the treatment margin were present, using the traditional approach the seminal vesicles were underdosed by 3–4% of the prescribed dose. The adaptive approach instead allowed for correct target dose coverage and lowered the dose on the rectum for each dosimetric endpoint on average by 3–4% in all the fractionation schemes. Standard intensity-modulated radiation therapy planning did not always guarantee a correct dose distribution on the seminal vesicles and the rectum. The adaptive planning strategy proposed resulted insensitive to the intra-fraction prostate drifts, produced a dose distribution in agreement with the dosimetric requirements in every case analysed and significantly lowered the dose on the rectum.

Highlights

  • In modern external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) for prostate cancer, intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is currently the most common treatment technique, allowing for delivery of highly conformal dose distributions [1]

  • The use of such a static characterizes IMRT still makes compensating for possible intra-fraction limitations, which may lead to treatment ineffectiveness by overdosing the organs at prostate motion and anatomy changes challenging

  • We analysed how the dose distribution is affected by prostate motion in different fractionation schemes, comparing results for the traditional planning method and the adaptive planning approach developed

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In modern external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) for prostate cancer, intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is currently the most common treatment technique, allowing for delivery of highly conformal dose distributions [1]. Is currently the most common treatment technique, allowing for delivery uncertainties consists in irradiating a larger volume, referred as to planning target volume (PTV), of highly conformal dose distributions [1]. The inverse planning approach that generated by adding a positive margin to the original treatment volume [2] The use of such a static characterizes IMRT still makes compensating for possible intra-fraction (i.e., during a treatment margin hasfraction many delivery) limitations, which may lead to treatment ineffectiveness by overdosing the organs at prostate motion and anatomy changes challenging. The traditional solution to risk (OAR)account or underdosing target [3,4,5,6,7,8].

Methods
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call