Comparison between classic ‘Fisch’ and ‘corner-tag’ meatoplasty techniques after canal wall down tympanomastoidectomy

Abstract

PurposeTo compare outcomes of two different methods of meatoplasty following Canal Wall-Down tympanomastoidectomy. MethodsA retrospective case review study of 48 patients with non-complicated unsafe chronic suppurative otitis media candidate for post-auricular canal wall-down tympanomastoidectomy via a post-auricular approach at Otolaryngology department, Benha university hospitals from January 2021 to January 2023, all were operated for the first time, and divided into 2 groups each of 24 patients. Group A submitted for classic ‘Fisch’, and group B ‘Corner-Tag’ meatoplasty. ResultsThe mean age was 28.88 ± 13.26 years in group A and 33.33 ± 16.04 years in group B. Only one patient (4.2 %) in each group developed wound infection and none in both groups developed perichondritis. Two patients (8.3 %) in group B compared to only one patient (4.2 %) in group A had granulations on the meatal incision. One patient (4.2 % of group A) needed revision meatoplasty. Group B needed more time for epithelization (mean 7.33 ± 0.96 weeks) than group A (mean 6.5 ± 0.88 weeks; P = 0.003*) also resulted in wider mean new meatus in group B (mean 10.50 ± 1.02 mm) than in group A (mean 9.63 ± 1.41 mm; P = 0.02*). ConclusionBoth techniques had comparable post-operative complications. ‘Corner-Tag’ technique needed more time for healing and epithelization but gave a wider new meatal diameter than ‘Fisch’ meatoplasty after one year of follow-up.