Abstract

Background Caesarean sections are usually performed under spinal anaesthesia. It provides effective postoperative pain control over a limited period of time. As a result, various intrathecal additives have been used. Recently, dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine have been used as adjuncts for different types of regional anaesthesia without increasing the risk of neurological complications. Objectives: We compared the analgesic effects of intrathecal dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine in elective caesarean sections. Design: A single-blind randomized trial. Setting: Benha University Hospital, between February 2021 and July 2021. Patients: We randomly enrolled 633 pregnant women in this study. Only 580 patients met all the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The inclusion criteria were age of 18 to 40 years old, an ASA class ІІ - III, gestational age > 37 weeks, BMI less than 30 kg/m2 who were electively scheduled for. The exclusion criteria included patient refusal, age < 18 or > 40 years, known allergy to medications used in the study, BMI more than 30 kg/m2, coagulopathies or anticoagulant use, cerebrovascular insufficiency, neuromuscular diseases and diabetic neuropathy. Intervention: The dexmedetomidine group (A) received 10 μg of dexmedetomidine with 12.5 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5%intrathecally(n=290). The dexamethasone group (B) received 4 mg of dexamethasone with 12.5 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5%intrathecally(n=290). Main outcome: The time to initial analgesic rescue (pethidine 0.5 mg/kg) and the duration of motor blockage were assessed. Results: The time to the first rescue analgesia and motor blockade were significantly higher in the dexmedetomidine group. (418 min vs 190 min), P<0.001, (324 min vs 144 min), P <0.001 respectively. Conclusion: According to this study, both drugs could be safely added to bupivacaine intrathecally. Dexmedetomidine provides significantly longer postoperative analgesia and motor blockade times than dexamethasone. Further dose-response studies are needed to determine the optimum dosage of dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine and the safety of the intrathecal route.

Highlights

  • Spinal anaesthesia is the most commonly used anaesthesia for caesarean sections

  • Spinal anaesthesia provides effective post operative analgesia; it is for a limited period of time

  • Dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine have been used as adjuncts for different types of regional anaesthesia without increasing the risk of neurological complications

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Spinal anaesthesia is the most commonly used anaesthesia for caesarean sections. When no contraindications to this technique exist, it is an ideal option [1]. As a result, expanding the duration of local anaesthesia is usually a focus of interest for anesthesiologists to produce extended and effective postoperative analgesia [4]. A previous study compared intrathecal dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine in lower abdominal surgeries and showed that dexmedetomidine resulted in longer duration of sensory block, motor block, and postoperative analgesia [15]. Considering a number of studies comparing dexmedetomidine and dexamethasone as adjuvants for bupivacaine in spinal anaesthesia, we designed a single-blind randomised study to compare the analgesic effect of intrathecal dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine in elective caesarean sections. Caesarean sections are usually performed under spinal anaesthesia It provides effective postoperative pain control over a limited period of time. Objectives: We compared the analgesic effects of intrathecal dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine in elective caesarean sections. Results: The time to the first rescue analgesia and motor blockade were significantly higher in the dexmedetomidine group. (418 min vs 190 min), P

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.