Comparison between 3D-FLAIR and 3D-real IR MRI sequences with visual classification method in the imaging of endolymphatic hydrops in Meniere's disease

Abstract

BackgroundClinically, the evidence of endolymphatic hydrops (EH) in Meniere's disease (MD) primarily relies on audiological examinations, such as glycerol tests and electrocochleography, to suggest the presence of EH indirectly. However, these techniques lack sensitivity and specificity, and they do not sufficiently assess the degree of EH. This study aims to explore the application of three-dimensional fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (3D-FLAIR) and three-dimensional real inversion recovery (3D-real IR) sequence imaging of EH in MD and to assess the image quality and grading of EH. MethodsThe study included 50 patients with definite MD. The 3D-FLAIR and 3D-real IR sequence images were performed 24 h after bilateral intratympanic injection of gadolinium. The image quality of both sequences was reviewed by two experienced radiologists. The vestibular and cochlear EH grades of both sequences were reviewed by two experienced otologists using a visual grading method. The Cohen's kappa and Pearson tests were used to analyze the data. ResultsThe reliability of image quality between the two radiologists was excellent (0.7 < kappa < 0.9). There were significant statistical differences in the image quality between the 3D-real IR and 3D-FLAIR sequences (p = 0.023 and p = 0.035, respectively). The reliability for the grading of vestibular and cochlear EH between the two otologists was excellent (0.7 < kappa < 0.9). The 3D-real IR sequence detected more severe hydrops than did the 3D-FLAIR sequence (p < 05). ConclusionThe image quality of the 3D-real IR sequence is better than that of the 3D-FLAIR sequence, and there are differences in the vestibular and cochlear EH grades of both sequences. The sensitivity of the 3D-real IR sequence in the cochlea is higher. The method of visual grading can be applied to both technologies when combined with 3D-real IR.