Abstract
Pyrazinamide (PZA) plays a critical role in shortening tuberculosis treatment duration and in treating multi-drug resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB). The standard phenotypic MGIT PZA susceptibility testing method is imperfect because it is slow and has potential for false resistance. In this study, we evaluated 2 different phenotypic-based methods, quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) phage assay, and MTT assay, as well as genotypic sequencing. The assay was evaluated on 71 clinical Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates (37 MGIT PZA susceptible and 34 MGIT PZA resistant) and compared to the MGIT result. Of these methods, the qPCR phage assay yielded an accuracy of 89% versus standard MGIT while MTT yielded 83%. The genotypic sequencing method yielded 90% accuracy. We conclude that any of these faster PZA susceptibility methods perform reasonably well against a MGIT PZA susceptibility standard.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
