Abstract
The increasing trend of non-cash payments such as QRIS and transfers is driving more intensive use of mobile banking applications in daily life. This poses a challenge for mobile banking service providers to deliver the best service to their customers through a good user experience. This is necessary to maintain their existence in the hearts of their customers. This research aims to determine the user experience value in each m-BCA and BRImo application, as well as their comparative value using the User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ) method. The analysis results conducted on 240 respondents with a minimum age of 19 and domiciled in Jabodetabek show that the user experience of BRImo is superior to m-BCA in all UEQ scales. BRImo achieves excellent benchmark scores in the attractive, perspicuity, efficiency, dependability, and stimulation scales while obtaining a good evaluation in the novelty scale. Meanwhile, m-BCA obtains excellent benchmark scores in the perspicuity, efficiency, and dependability scales, good evaluation on the attractive scale, above average on the stimulation scale, and below average on the novelty scale.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: International Journal of Management and Business Economics
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
