Comparing WAG-CO2 Injection with Continuous Water and Gas Injection in Separate Wells for the Development and Management of a CO2-Rich Light Oil Fractured Carbonate Reservoir Subject to Full Gas Recycling

Abstract

Abstract Many projects in the Brazilian pre-salt assume the use of water alternating gas (WAG-CO2) injection as an ecologically safe carbon storage strategy, with improved hydrocarbon recovery. However, studies that compare these advantages with a simpler management plan are not common. The objective of this work is to compare WAG-CO2 injection with continuous injection of water and gas (CIWG) rich in CO2 in separate wells for the development and management of a light-oil fractured carbonate reservoir subject to full gas recycling. We employed the UNISIM-II benchmark model, a naturally fractured carbonate reservoir with Brazilian pre-salt characteristics, which enables an application in controlled environment where the reference response is known (UNISIM-II-R). We used a model-based decision analysis for production strategy selection, hierarchical optimization of the decision variables and algorithms to maximize the objective function. Representative models (RM) are selected from the ensemble of models and used to incorporate the effects of geological, reservoir, and operational uncertainties into the optimization process. The net present value is the objective function during the nominal optimization of candidate strategies of each RM and the expected monetary value and risk analysis are considered to select the final production strategy considering uncertainties. The risk analysis was quantified based on downside risk and upside potential relation to a benchmark return. We optimized two alternative development plans (one considering WAG-CO2 injection and the other continuous injection of water and gas in separate wells) and compared their performance indicators and decision variables, including design variables (number, type and placement of well, and size of production facilities) and life-cycle control rules (management of equipment over time). We then applied a cross-simulation, where the best strategy optimized for one recovery method was applied to the other and the injection strategy was optimized again. We were therefore able to assess the need to pre-define the recovery method before defining design variables to validate the flexibility of each strategy for possible future changes in the recovery mechanism. Finally, we repeated the study for different reservoir scenarios to compare the alternatives considering typical uncertainties of the Brazilian pre-salt and validated the final strategies in the reference model to quantify the real value in decision making. The strategies reached a full gas recycling in both recovery methods and allowed a comparison of their advantages and disadvantages. The operations of WAG-CO2 injection can be more complex and the equipment more expensive. The novelty of this work is the consideration of continuous injection of water and gas in separate wells as a simpler alternative to the development and management of pre-salt oil fields, since this method may also meet operators’ and environmental demands, bearing simpler operating challenges and promoting good recovery and profitability.