Abstract

Tensions over borders lie at the center of a growing global debate. But while politicians argue, some US higher education institutions (HEIs) have made education and protections possible for displaced students. Using securitization theory and social movement theory to examine the role of HEIs as they responded to immigration policies attempted by the Trump Administration, this article compares interventions in the United States for undocumented “DREAMers” and at-risk international students primarily from Muslim-majority countries. Both populations have been singled out as security threats by anti-immigration rhetoric and new restrictive policies. While priorities and practices of US HEIs and related agencies toward these at-risk populations indicate competing values, interests, and roles, they also evidence a humanitarian impulse to help. This article investigates the range of responses documented and concludes with recommendations for further research.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.