Abstract

BackgroundFrailty is a dynamic age-related condition of increased vulnerability characterized by declines across multiple physiologic systems and associated with an increased risk of death. We compared the predictive accuracy for one-month and one-year all-cause mortality of four frailty instruments in a large population of hospitalized older patients in a prospective multicentre cohort study.Methods and FindingsOn 2033 hospitalized patients aged ≥65 years from twenty Italian geriatric units, we calculated the frailty indexes derived from the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures (FI-SOF), based on the cumulative deficits model (FI-CD), based on a comprehensive geriatric assessment (FI-CGA), and the Multidimensional Prognostic Index (MPI). The overall mortality rates were 8.6% after one-month and 24.9% after one-year follow-up. All frailty instruments were significantly associated with one-month and one-year all-cause mortality. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves estimated from age- and sex-adjusted logistic regression models, accounting for clustering due to centre effect, showed that the MPI had a significant higher discriminatory accuracy than FI-SOF, FI-CD, and FI-CGA after one month (areas under the ROC curves: FI-SOF = 0.685 vs. FI-CD = 0.738 vs. FI-CGA = 0.724 vs. MPI = 0.765, p<0.0001) and one year of follow-up (areas under the ROC curves: FI-SOF = 0.694 vs. FI-CD = 0.729 vs. FI-CGA = 0.727 vs. MPI = 0.750, p<0.0001). The MPI showed a significant higher discriminatory power for predicting one-year mortality also in hospitalized older patients without functional limitations, without cognitive impairment, malnourished, with increased comorbidity, and with a high number of drugs.ConclusionsAll frailty instruments were significantly associated with short- and long-term all-cause mortality, but MPI demonstrated a significant higher predictive power than other frailty instruments in hospitalized older patients.

Highlights

  • In the last years, different conceptual definitions of frailty have been reported, i.e., phenotypic [1], accumulation of deficits [2], and multiple domain aggregate or multidimensional [3]

  • FI-SOF: Frailty Index derived from the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures; Frailty index based on cumulative deficits (FI-CD): Frailty Index based on cumulative deficits; FI-CGA: Frailty Index based on a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment; ADL: activities of daily living; IADL: instrumental activities of daily living; SPMSQ: Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire; CIRS: Cumulative Illness Rating Scale; MNA: Mini Nutritional Assessment; ESS: Exton-Smith Scale; MPI: Multidimensional Prognostic Index. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0029090.t001

  • FI-SOF: Frailty Index derived from the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures; FI-CD: Frailty Index based on cumulative deficits; FI-CGA: Frailty Index based on a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment; ADL: activities of daily living; IADL: instrumental activities of daily living; SPMSQ: Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire; CIRS: Cumulative Illness Rating Scale; MNA: Mini Nutritional Assessment; ESS: Exton-Smith Scale; MPI: Multidimensional Prognostic Index. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0029090.t002

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Different conceptual definitions of frailty have been reported, i.e., phenotypic [1], accumulation of deficits [2], and multiple domain aggregate or multidimensional [3]. Based on this last model, an integral conceptual working definition, taking into account essential components of existing conceptual definitions [4,5], indicates frailty as a dynamic age-related condition of increased vulnerability characterized by declines across multiple physiologic systems and associated with an increased risk of negative outcomes, i.e., institutionalization and death [6]. We compared the predictive accuracy for one-month and one-year all-cause mortality of four frailty instruments in a large population of hospitalized older patients in a prospective multicentre cohort study

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call