Comparing the performance of two camera trap-based methods to survey small mustelids

Abstract

Small mustelids are an understudied group partly due to the challenges in detecting and monitoring their populations. Despite the classification as Least Concern for several small mustelid species, some studies indicate a population decline in parts of their range. Therefore, efficient and group-specific methods are essential to support monitoring efforts. Camera traps are widely used, particularly to monitor cryptic and nocturnal species such as most carnivores. However, they tend to miss small-sized and fast-moving species due to the sensitivity of the passive infrared sensor. The Mostela is a device which consists of a camera trap and a tracking tunnel inside a wooden box, designed specifically to detect small mustelids. Here, we propose testing the performance of this device and comparing it to a tree-mounted camera trap, using the least weasel (M. nivalis) as a case study. We used multi-scale occupancy models to estimate differences in the detection probability between devices. Although both methods detected the least weasel, the detection probability was higher with the Mostela (0.8, BCI: 0.52–0.97 vs 0.2, BCI: 0.03–0.48). Furthermore, we obtained a higher trapping rate when using a shorter distance between sampling stations (∼350 m). Although the Mostela performed better at detecting the weasel, the number of independent events was low (N = 11). Therefore, we present recommendations in terms of deployment and future research since the development and testing of new methods are essential for the conservation efforts of small mustelids.