Abstract

Dissolved organic matter (DOM) is recognized as a good indicator of water quality as its concentration is influenced by land use, rainwater, windborne material and anthropogenic activities. Recent technological advances make it possible to characterize fluorescent dissolved organic matter (FDOM), the fraction of DOM that fluoresces. Among these advances, portable fluorometers and benchtop fluorescence excitation and emission spectroscopy coupled with a parallel factor analysis (EEM-PARAFAC) have shown to be reliable. Despite their rising popularity, there is still a need to evaluate the extent to which these techniques can assess DOM dynamics at the watershed scale. We compare the performance of in-situ measurements of FDOM with laboratory measurements of fluorescence spectroscopy within the context of two distinct glacierized watersheds in Peru. Glacierized watersheds represent unique testing environments with contrasting DOM conditions, flowing from pristine, vegetation-free headwaters through locations with obvious anthropogenic influences. We used an in-situ fluorometer and a portable multimeter to take 38 measurements of FDOM, pH and turbidity throughout the two catchments. Additionally, samples were analyzed in the laboratory using the EEM-PARAFAC method. Results were compared to dissolved organic carbon (DOC) measurements using standard high-temperature catalytic oxidation. Our results show that the three techniques together were able to capture the DOM dynamics for both studied watersheds. Taken individually, all three methods allowed detection of the watershed DOM main points of sources but in a more limited way. Due to the narrow bandwidth of the portable fluorometer used in the study, FDOM measurements were almost non-detectable to protein-like substances. Indeed, the more demanding EEM-PARAFAC was able to both differentiate between potential sources of DOM and provide an estimate of relative concentrations of different organic components. Finally, similar to FDOM but to a lesser extent, the DOC measurements showed some limits where protein-like substances make up most of the DOM composition.

Highlights

  • The Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM) approach is accepted internationally as the way forward for efficient, equitable and sustainable development and management of the world’s limited water resources (UN-Water, 2008)

  • dissolved organic carbon (DOC), fluorescent dissolved organic matter (FDOM) and excitation and emission matrices (EEMs)-parallel factor analysis (PARAFAC) results are presented on a single graph to facilitate comparison

  • None of the methods taken individually achieved the same level of detail and accuracy as when the three methods were combined: C The performance of the instruments used in this research suggests that, even if FDOM represents only a fraction of Dissolved organic matter (DOM), it captures dynamics that are to a certain extent comparable to those of the bulk DOM signal

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM) approach is accepted internationally as the way forward for efficient, equitable and sustainable development and management of the world’s limited water resources (UN-Water, 2008). IWRM incorporates water quality aspects, requiring monitoring of key water physico-chemical and biological parameters in a distributed way (Nikolaou et al, 2008; Sun et al, 2013). Among those parameters, DOM could be a proxy for capturing rapid changes in water quality and thereby provide an early warning signal for the quality of water supply (Yao et al, 2015). DOM takes part in the transport of organic and inorganic compounds (Conte and Kucerik, 2016), including pollutants, at the watershed scale (Chen et al, 2019; Derrien et al, 2019; Old et al, 2019)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call