Abstract
The European Commission (EC) aflatoxin sampling plan for ready-to-eat tree nuts such as almonds requires that each of the three 10 kg laboratory samples must all test less than 2 ng/g aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) and 4 ng/g total aflatoxins (AFT) for the lot to be accepted. Exporters have observed that the AFB1/AFT ratio varied greatly from sample to sample and the ratio appeared to average more than 50%. Because of the concern that dual limits associated with the EC aflatoxin sampling plans may reject more lots than similar sampling plans that use a single limit based upon total aflatoxins, studies were designed with the objectives to (a) measure the distribution of AFB1/AFT ratio values using sample test results associated with testing U.S. almond lots exported to the European Union; (b) use Monte Carlo methods to develop a model to compute the effects of using dual limits based upon AFB1 and AFT on the probability of accepting almond lots; and (c) compare the probability of accepting almond lots using the current Codex aflatoxin sampling plans for tree nuts when using single limits versus the use of dual limits. The study results showed that the mean and median among 3,257 AFB1/AFT ratio values was 87.6% and 91.9%, respectively, indicating that the distribution among the ratio values was negatively skewed. Only 31% of the 3,257 AFB1/AFT ratio values are less than the mean ratio of 87.6%. Codex aflatoxin sampling plans for tree nuts using a single limit based upon total aflatoxins had the highest probability of accepting lots at all lot concentrations when compared to the probability of accepting lots with dual limits. As the AFB1 limit decreased from 90 to 50% of the total limit, the probability of rejecting lots at all concentrations increased when compared to the Codex aflatoxin sampling plans with a single limit based upon total aflatoxins.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
