Abstract

Current literature reports a wide range of stiffness values and constitutive models for lung tissue across different spatial scales. Comparing the reported lung tissue stiffness values across different spatial scales may provide insights into how well those mechanical properties and the proposed constitutive models represent lung tissue’s mechanical behavior. Thus, this study applies in silico modeling to compare and potentially bridge the differences reported in lung tissue mechanical properties at different length scales. Specifically, we predicted the mesoscale mechanical behavior of rat lung tissue based on in situ and in vitro microscale test data using finite element (FE) analysis and compared those computational predictions to the reported data using mesoscale uniaxial experiments. Our simulations showed that microscale-based stiffness values differed from the mesoscale data in the simulated strain range of 0–60%, with the atomic force microscopy (AFM)-based data overestimating the mesoscale data above 15% strain. This research demonstrates that computational modeling can be used as an informative and guiding tool to investigate and potentially bridge the differences in reported lung tissue material properties across length scales.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.