Abstract

Introduction We compared the identification of 52 Clostridium species from 52 incident bacteraemic patients using phenotypic analysis, two MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry platforms and molecular sequencing. We also examined the impact of different sample preparations and (on one platform) days of colonial growth on the performance of MALDI-TOF systems. Result 16S rRNA PCR accurately identified 10 Clostridium species amongst the 52 isolates. Combination phenotypic methods identified 44/52 (84.6%) to species level. Spectrometric analysis using Vitek MS yielded 47/52 (90.4%) species using direct transfer (DT), whilst analysis using Bruker MS yielded correct identification dependent on sample preparation [69.2% for DT protocol, 100% for extended direct transfer (EDT) protocol and 100% for full formic extraction (EX) protocol]. Sample preparation didn’t impact the Vitek MS. There was at least moderate agreement in performance for DT, EDT and EX between different days for the Bruker MS. Conclusion Phenotypic identification required numerous methods to accurately identified Clostridium species. Vitek MALDI-TOF MS performed better with the DT protocol compared to the Bruker MS, but the latter yielded correct identification in all samples tested with EDT and EX protocol. Sample preparations did not impact the Vitek MS. On the Bruker MS, the testing cycle can begin upon view of colonial growth.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.