Abstract

The greenness and sustainability of three different routes for the synthesis of an advanced intermediate for a group of HIV protease inhibitors used in antiretroviral (ARV) therapy are compared.

Highlights

  • Since the onset of the HIV-AIDS epidemic in 1981, 76.10 million people have been infected globally by the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), with sub-Saharan Africa accounting for two-thirds of this total.[1]

  • Route A (Scheme 1)[13] made use of an enantio- and diastereoselective crossed aldol reaction between 4-butyloxy-1-butanal (2) and polymeric ethyl glyoxylate (3) in the presence of 3 mol% (S)-diphenylprolinol (4) to give aldol product 5, which was protected as the acetal derivative 6 before isolation

  • The authors went on to improve the product ee through crystallisation to produce a carbonate-derived product salt, our assessment ended at the point of the bis-THF

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Since the onset of the HIV-AIDS epidemic in 1981, 76.10 million people have been infected globally by the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), with sub-Saharan Africa accounting for two-thirds of this total.[1]. For each synthetic pathway, (i) waste generation (E-factor),[14,18] (ii) greenness relative to industrial benchmarks following the innovative Green Aspiration Level (iGALTM) methodology,[19,20] (iii) solvent intensity and nature according to the GSK solvent guide,[21] and (iv) score according to the Green MotionTM methodology of MANE.[22] Notwithstanding the importance of process greenness, in order to be sustainable a process must be cost-effective and this is determined by, inter alia, the cost of raw materials and solvents and the number of unit operations. Metrics and assessment tools provide chemists and chemical engineers with guidelines and measures that aid in developing safer and less impactful products and processes. Examples of web-based tools and guides that are used in a conceptual design stage to assess process greenness are the iGALTM and associated green scorecards, Green MotionTM, and the GSK solvent sustainability guide

Results and discussion
The E-factor
Solvent selection
A Bstep-by-step Bone-pot Cstep-by-step Cone-pot
Green Motion
2: Solvent selection
5: Process efficiency
7: Waste reduction
The radial polygon
Comparing the greenness and sustainability of routes to the THF-alcohol
Summary and conclusions
Take home message

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.