Abstract

Objectives of this Trial: The objectives of this trial were to compare the treatment of lymphedema by creating artificial pathways along with standard compressive therapy versus standard therapy alone in Stage 2 and 3 lymphedema. Materials and Methods: A total of 18 patients were randomized into two groups. Silicone group (n = 8) received the placement of fenestrated silicone tubes subcutaneously from the hand to scapular region along with standard compression therapy, and the control group (n = 10) received standard compression therapy only. Follow-up was for 6 months. Results: A mean reduction of limb volume in the silicone group was 887 ml (25%), whereas in the control group, it was 250 ml (8%) (P = 0.01). All patients, 8 (100%) of silicone group and only 4 (40%) of control group, had ≥10% limb volume reduction at the end of 24 weeks with P = 0.013. More number of patients in the silicone group had a mean reduction in limb circumference of ≥2 cm as compared to the control group at almost all points of measurements along the limb with P

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.