Comparing the effectiveness of single-lumen high-frequency positive pressure ventilation with double-lumen endobronchial tube for the anesthesia management of endoscopic thoracic sympathetic blockade surgery.

Abstract

In this trial, we aimed to compare anesthetic effectiveness of single lumen tube (SLT) for tracheal intubation with high-frequency positive pressure ventilation (HFPPV) versus classic double lumen tube (DLT) for tracheal intubation in endoscopic thoracic sympathetic blockade surgery. This was a prospective randomized controlled clinical study. The study was single-centered and conducted in a university hospital. There were 135 endoscopic thoracic sympathetic blockade patients in this study. The patients were randomly allocated either to DLT (n = 67) or SLT (n = 68) groups. In SLT group, the ventilator setting was kept with frequencies that range from 1 to 1.8 Hz (60-110/min). Data regarding anesthesia duration, surgery duration, difficult intraoperative lung deflation, postoperative atelectasis, postoperative pain, postoperative pneumothorax were recorded and compared. All patients were operated by a single experienced surgeon under general anesthesia provided by the same anesthesia team. Both groups were age and gender matched. Among all recorded variables, only anesthesia time was found to be close to statistical significance (P = .059, favoring single lumen). All other parameters were found to be similar between groups. (P < .05). We reported that DLT and single lumen tracheal intubation were equally effective for lung deflation during surgery, and SLT with HFPPV ventilation mode during endoscopic thoracic sympathetic blockade surgery provided the surgeon with an adequate and clean workspace with shorter onset of anesthesia. We may suggest the HFPPV technique for uncomplicated surgery groups or where sufficient conditions for DLT cannot be provided in the operating room.