Comparing the convected level-set and the Allen–Cahn phase-field methods in AMR/C simulations of two-phase flows

Abstract

The modeling and simulation of two-phase flows is still an active research area, mainly when surface tension is present. One way to model the different phases is with interface capturing methods. Two well-established interface capturing approaches are the level-set and phase-field methods. The level-set method is known for its ability to compute the surface tension accurately, and phase-field models satisfy the second law of thermodynamics. This paper reviews and compares a level-set and a phase-field approach to simulate two-phase flows. We use a modified level-set method called convected level-set. The difference from the standard level-set method is that the re-initialization step is embedded in the convection equation, avoiding a separate step during the calculation. We also apply a global mass conservation procedure to enforce the mass balance between phases. On the other hand, the phase-field approach uses a conservative Allen–Cahn equation with a Lagrange multiplier to conserve the mass. The methods are implemented in libMesh, a parallel adaptive finite element library, using the same finite element formulations, time-marching schemes, solvers, and mesh adaptivity strategies. We present numerical solutions for the two methods considering adaptive mesh refinement and coarsening (AMR/C). Results are analyzed and discussed.