Abstract
It is generally believed that a distributed intelligent system, such as a holonic manufacturing system (HMS), should be more reconfigurable than a conventional hierarchical manufacturing system (HiMS). However, a recent case study suggested that the control structure of a modern HiMS, such as ISA S88-based manufacturing system, can-under certain condition-be as reconfigurable as that of a HMS, such as holonic component-based architecture (HCBA)-based manufacturing system . This result is particularly interesting and this paper focuses on clarifying this issue. This is done by analyzing the control structure and the ease of reconfiguration of both HCBA and ISA S88-based manufacturing systems. It is found that both architectures possess similar level of ease of reconfiguration because both architectures are product-driven manufacturing control and their control functions are independent to product and production system.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews)
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.