Abstract

Introduction: Macular holes are primarily managed surgically; either conventional full-thickness Macular Hole (FTMH) repair or the inverted flap technique. Large macular holes (>than 400 micrometers) have poor surgical outcome, with only 44% closure and inverted flap method has resulted better outcome in visual recovery and a higher closure rate. Objective: To compare surgical outcome (anatomical and functional) between conventional and inverted ILM flap technique in macular hole surgery. Methodology: A prospective randomized clinical trial; a longitudinal study with 2 waves of data collection. 154 Pseudo-phakic clients (50-70 years) with full-thickness large macular hole were randomly selected to 2 groups to undergo either technique by same consultant VR surgeon. The approval of Ethics Committee of the National Eye Hospital was obtained. Results: There is 88.3% closure in conventional group and 96% closure in inverted flap technique. However, no significant difference between 2 groups (p>0.05) in the anatomical success and even when compared sub-categorically with U, V, W closure and non-closure. There was a statistically significant improvement in visual acuity (p=0.002) observed in the inverted flap group, but the improvement observed in visual acuity among CG (p=0.18), the improvement in Snellen Chart reading of both groups (p=0.15) and type of closure and surgical technique (p=.369) were not statistically significant. Conclusion: The overall success of anatomical closure following FTMH repair is significantly better compared to literature (92.2% Vs 44%); but there is no statistically significant difference in anatomical success between the two groups. Both groups had a better functional outcome and a statistically significant improvement seen in the ILM-G and CG group. Recommendations: Being the first such study, data gives promising evidence to support the current surgical practice and assist in service development and training.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.