Abstract

Many studies have explored the role of regulation of learning in supporting social knowledge construction. Other-regulation is a common regulation type in collaborative learning. However, few studies have examined learners` social knowledge construction in other-regulation groups. This study attempts to provide a new lens to understand the role of regulation of learning in supporting social knowledge construction and broaden our knowledge about two forms of other-regulation within groups. Toward that end, this study compares social knowledge construction in groups characterized by facilitative and directive other-regulation. The two case groups of four in this study were selected from a larger sample (N=22). Content analysis and sequential analysis were used to analyze the online chat log collected from two groups. The comparison was made in terms of the frequency and behaviour pattern of social knowledge construction between the two groups. Qualitative analysis was adopted to explore the interrelation between social knowledge construction and two forms of other-regulation. Results indicate that the facilitative other-regulation group engaged in more high-level social knowledge construction and demonstrated more continuous and systematic behaviour patterns. Further qualitative analysis reveals that facilitative other-regulation occurred concurrently with social knowledge construction and played a promoting role in this process. In contrast, directive other-regulation followed social knowledge construction but failed to guide the subsequent knowledge construction moves, ending in impeding the ongoing of social knowledge construction smoothly.

Highlights

  • 1.1 Introduce the ProblemTheories of social constructivism suggest that new knowledge is constructed through social interaction (Driver et al, 2014; Leach & Scott, 2000; Lochhead & Yager, 1996)

  • Research has established that regulation of learning, which refers to monitoring and control intentionally conducted by students during the learning process in order to achieve learning goals (Pintrich, 2004; Su et al, 2018; Zimmerman & Schunk, 2011), leads to better social knowledge construction (e.g., Chan, 2012; Hmelo-Silver & Barrows, 2008; Volet, Summers & Thurman, 2009)

  • The purpose of the current study is to bring a new lens to explore the role of regulation of learning in supporting social knowledge construction and broaden our knowledge about facilitative and directive other-regulation in groups, which can further increase our understanding of the dynamic of collaborative learning

Read more

Summary

Introduction

1.1 Introduce the ProblemTheories of social constructivism suggest that new knowledge is constructed through social interaction (Driver et al, 2014; Leach & Scott, 2000; Lochhead & Yager, 1996). Other-regulation is primarily regarded as guiding and instructive (Hardwin & Oshige, 2011), researchers have identified a second form of other-regulation characterized by controlling and managing (Rogat & Linnenbrink-Garcia, 2011; Volet & Mansfield, 2006). These two forms of other-regulation are conceptualized as facilitative and directive other-regulation. It is reasonable to assume that social knowledge construction in groups characterized by facilitative or directive other-regulation http://journal.julypress.com/index.php/jed

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call