Abstract

In patients experiencing colorectal carcinoma, exhaustive analysis of indicates extent of hepatic and pulmonary surgery that prolongs survival of patients. To localize metastasis, we compared 2 F-FDG PET-CT imaging protocols, early respiratory gated scan, and delayed scan, to standard PET imaging procedure. SUVmax and lesion-to-healthy tissue ratio were measured in 60 pulmonary and 21 hepatic lesions by each of the 2 imaging protocols. In the liver, metastatic lesion-to-healthy tissue ratios significantly increased on delayed scans as compared with early scans (P < 0.001). Better ratios could not be obtained when using respiratory gated scans, whereas more lesions were detected on delayed scans. In the lungs, metastatic lesion- to-healthy tissue ratio increased significantly on delayed scans for largest lesions (P < 0.001). Ratios were not better when exploring smallest metastatic lesions or when using respiratory gated scans. Factors interfering with F-FDG PET-CT sensitivity are discussed, such as respiratory motion and high FDG physiological uptake in healthy liver parenchyma. Our studies indicate that routine acquisitions should use delayed hepatic scans for all patients referred for evaluation, recurrence check, or monitoring of colorectal adenocarcinoma. Delayed pulmonary scans are useful for the largest metastatic lesions and should be used in addition to early scan. In our experience, respiratory gated scans seem to be less convenient because of a low sensitivity in detection, as compared with the delayed technique; in addition, this technique is currently complicated by some technical issues, although these might be overcome with new gated protocols.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.