Abstract

Sediment DNA (sedDNA) analyses are rapidly emerging as powerful tools for the reconstruction of environmental and evolutionary change. While there are an increasing number of studies using molecular genetic approaches to track changes over time, few studies have compared the coherence between quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methods and metabarcoding techniques. Primer specificity, bioinformatic analyses, and PCR inhibitors in sediments could affect the quantitative data obtained from these approaches. We compared the performance of droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) and high-throughput sequencing (HTS) for the quantification of target genes of cyanobacteria in lake sediments and tested whether the two techniques similarly reveal expected patterns through time. Absolute concentrations of cyanobacterial 16S rRNA genes were compared between ddPCR and HTS using dated sediment cores collected from two experimental (Lake 227, fertilized since 1969 and Lake 223, acidified from 1976 to 1983) and two reference lakes (Lakes 224 and 442) in the Experimental Lakes Area (ELA), Canada. Relative abundances of Microcystis 16S rRNA (MICR) genes were also compared between the two methods. Moderate to strong positive correlations were found between the molecular approaches among all four cores but results from ddPCR were more consistent with the known history of lake manipulations. A 100-fold increase in ddPCR estimates of cyanobacterial gene abundance beginning in ~1968 occurred in Lake 227, in keeping with experimental addition of nutrients and increase in planktonic cyanobacteria. In contrast, no significant rise in cyanobacterial abundance associated with lake fertilization was observed with HTS. Relative abundances of Microcystis between the two techniques showed moderate to strong levels of coherence in top intervals of the sediment cores. Both ddPCR and HTS approaches are suitable for sedDNA analysis, but studies aiming to quantify absolute abundances from complex environments should consider using ddPCR due to its high tolerance to PCR inhibitors.

Highlights

  • The recent advances and application of molecular approaches using DNA archived in sediment provide for considerable expansion in this field, for analyses of microbial communities

  • While the two methods were significantly correlated with one another, the targeted droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) approach reflected more accurately the significant rise in cyanobacteria associated with experimental fertilization

  • Our results showed quantification of the cyanobacterial 16S rRNA gene from ddPCR was more consistent with the known history of lake experimentation

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The recent advances and application of molecular approaches using DNA archived in sediment provide for considerable expansion in this field, for analyses of microbial communities. While there have been a few studies that have used a combination of molecular techniques on sedDNA, predominantly PCR-directed methods (Singh et al, 2017; Hamaguchi et al, 2018), there remains a lack of research directly examining the coherence and correlation between quantitative methods This is of particular concern in the analysis of sediment samples where PCR inhibitors (such as humic acids) can be found at high levels, which can interfere with the sensitivity of the technology used and/or produce false results (Rochelle et al, 1992; Savichtcheva et al, 2011; Albers et al, 2013). Alternate methods should be applied as some PCR techniques have been found to be more tolerant to inhibitors than others (Taylor et al, 2017, 2019; Wood et al, 2019)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.