Abstract
AimHeart rate (HR) is the most important parameter to evaluate newborns’ clinical condition and to guide intervention during resuscitation at birth. The present study aims to compare the accuracy of NeoBeat dry‐electrode ECG for HR measurement with conventional ECG and pulse oximetry (PO).MethodsNewborns with a gestational age ≥32 weeks and/or birth weight ≥1.5 kg were included when HR evaluation was needed. HR was simultaneously measured for 10 min with NeoBeat, PO and conventional ECG.ResultsA total of 18 infants were included (median (IQR) gestational age 39 (36–39) weeks and birth weight 3 150 (2 288–3 859) grams). Mean (SD) duration until NeoBeat obtained a reliable signal was 2.5 (9.0) s versus 58.5 (171.0) s for PO. Mean difference between NeoBeat and ECG was 1.74 bpm (LoA −4.987–8.459 and correlation coefficient 0.98). Paired HR measurements over 30‐s intervals revealed no significant difference between NeoBeat and ECG. The positive predictive value of a detected HR <100 bpm by NeoBeat compared with ECG was 54.84%, negative predictive value 99.99%, sensitivity 94.44%, specificity 99.99% and accuracy 99.85%.ConclusionsHR measurement with NeoBeat dry‐electrode ECG at birth is reliable and accurate.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
