Comparing Procedural Safeguards during the Primary Investigation Stage and Civil Compensation: Beijing Rules vs. Jordanian Legislation in Juvenile Justice

Abstract

This study critically evaluates the privacy protections and civil compensation afforded to delinquent juveniles under Jordanian Juvenile Law No. 32 of 2014, comparing them with the United Nations Beijing Rules of 1985. The analysis is structured into three key sections: identifying the authority responsible for juvenile investigations, assessing the level of confidentiality during these procedures, and examining the support mechanisms available to delinquent juveniles throughout the investigative phase. The findings reveal that both the domestic legal framework and international treaties fail to adequately prioritize the best interests and protection of delinquent juveniles. While each source of law possesses its own strengths and weaknesses, they collectively underscore the need for substantial reforms to enhance the rights, well-being, and civil compensation for delinquent juveniles more effectively.