Abstract

Background: Several studies have shown that classroom teachers can strongly influence the implementation and potential success of inclusive education (IE). Therefore, assessing teachers/pre-service teachers’ attitudes toward IE with an objective scale is a key issue for many academic publications. This study compared differences in pre-service teachers’ attitudes toward IE between Thailand and Japan and discussed these differences mainly from the perspective of differences in their educational systems for children with disabilities. Method: This study’s survey utilized a modified version of the Attitude Toward Inclusion Instrument. The study participants were 109 and 221 pre-service teachers who were enrolled in teacher preparation programs in Thailand and Japan, respectively. Result: The basic concepts and ideologies of IE were similarly and widely accepted in both countries. However, Thai pre-service teachers were more likely to strongly perceive that education in special schools would have a negative impact for students with disabilities and that IE would have a positive impact. On the other hand, Japanese pre- service teachers had a more negative perception of the feasibility of IE compared to Thai teachers. Discussion: We attributed this result to the difference in the popularity and credibility of special education in the two countries. Japanese pre-service teachers held a more positive attitude toward special education compared to their Thai counterparts. However, this attitude may have caused Japanese pre-service teachers to become more concerned about IE, which could be a barrier to expanding IE in Japan.

Highlights

  • According to the World Health Organization, there are 93 - 150 million children with disabilities between the ages of 0 and 14 worldwide (World Health Organization (WHO), 2011)

  • Efforts to provide education or training to disabled children are generally carried out through separate special schools, which usually target specific impairments for intervention. This situation began to change after the Salamanca World Conference on Special Needs Education, which endorsed the idea of inclusive education (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), 1994)

  • We found that the basic concepts and ideologies of inclusive education (IE) (Q1, Q2, Q9, Q14, Q16) were and widely accepted in both countries

Read more

Summary

Introduction

According to the World Health Organization, there are 93 - 150 million children with disabilities between the ages of 0 and 14 worldwide (World Health Organization (WHO), 2011). Efforts to provide education or training to disabled children are generally carried out through separate special schools, which usually target specific impairments for intervention. This study compared differences in pre-service teachers’ attitudes toward IE between Thailand and Japan and discussed these differences mainly from the perspective of differences in their educational systems for children with disabilities. Thai pre-service teachers were more likely to strongly perceive that education in special schools would have a negative impact for students with disabilities and that IE would have a positive impact. Japanese pre-service teachers held a more positive attitude toward special education compared to their Thai counterparts. This attitude may have caused Japanese pre-service teachers to become more concerned about IE, which could be a barrier to expanding IE in Japan

Methods
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.